Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Active Learning in Higher Education
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Huxham, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Learning in lectures

Do ‘interactive windows’ help?

Mark Huxham

Napier University, Edinburgh, UK, m.huxham{at}napier.ac.uk

Many educational development resources recommend making conventional lectures more interactive. However, there is little firm evidence supporting either the acceptability (to students) or efficacy of doing so. This research examined the use of short ‘interactive windows’ (discussions and problem-solving exercises) in first year evolution lectures delivered to between 73 and 126 students over five years. Semi-structured evaluations of the teaching, involving more than 500 responses, identified the interactive nature of the lectures as the single most popular feature of the sessions. The division of the year class into two separate groups allowed the opportunistic testing of how interactive windows influenced learning about discrete problems within each lecture. Two short problem-solving or discussion sessions were devised for each lecture; one of these sessions was taught interactively to the first student group, the second was taught interactively to the second group. Comparing test scores achieved in questions addressing these paired problems showed strong evidence for a generally weak, positive influence of the interactive windows on recall and learning.

Key Words: buzz groups • evaluation • interaction • lectures • recall

Active Learning in Higher Education, Vol. 6, No. 1, 17-31 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1469787405049943
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Active Learning in Higher EducationHome page
B. J. Dyson
Assessing small-scale interventions in large-scale teaching: A general methodology and preliminary data
Active Learning in Higher Education, November 1, 2008; 9(3): 265 - 282.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Active Learning in Higher EducationHome page
B. Cooper
Central issues in the use of computer-based materials for high volume entrepreneurship education
Active Learning in Higher Education, November 1, 2007; 8(3): 201 - 217.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Active Learning in Higher EducationHome page
P. L. Machemer and P. Crawford
Student perceptions of active learning in a large cross-disciplinary classroom
Active Learning in Higher Education, March 1, 2007; 8(1): 9 - 30.
[Abstract] [PDF]