This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ryan, G. J. Articles by Jia, H. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Peer, professor and self-evaluation of class participation

Leisa L. Marshall

Kalen Porter

Mercer University College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, USA

Haomiao Jia

Mercer University School of Medicine, USA

The purpose of this project was to determine the validity of peer and self-evaluations of class participation compared to professors' class participation grades. Students (N = 96) evaluated themselves and their classmates on class participation on a four-point scale and students were required to assign grades in a normalized distribution. Relative to faculty evaluations, the bias and precision of the peer grades were 0.48 points and 36.3 per cent (p < 0.05) and self-evaluations scores were -0.48 and 77.5 per cent (p < 0.05).There was no correlation between a student's grade point average and his/her opinion of this process (R = 0.02). Students did not like peer assessment using forced distribution of grades.

Key Words: faculty assessment • class participation • peer assessment • self-assessment

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?