This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Cooper, B. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Central issues in the use of computer-based materials for high volume entrepreneurship education

University of Strathclyde, UK, billy.c{at}strath.ac.uk

This article discusses issues relating to the use of computer-based learning (CBL) materials for entrepreneurship education at university level. It considers CBL as a means of addressing the increased volume and range of provision required in the current context. The issues raised in this article have importance for all forms of computer-based learning and also have relevance for emerging technologies in the field. Based on evidence reported in this article, it is argued that, while there is potential for gaining economies of scale by using CBL materials for entrepreneurship education, there are also potential trade offs and conflicts of interest involved in such approaches. The findings also point to the importance of the student perspective for the design and use of CBL materials for high volume entrepreneurship education.

Key Words: computer-based learning • entrepreneurship education • large classes • university education

References

• Ehrmann, S.C. (1995) `The Bad Option and the Good Option', Active Learning 2(July): 23—4.
• Gardner, H. (1999) `Multiple Approaches to Understanding', in C. M. Reigeluth (ed.) Instructional Design Theories and Models, pp. 71—89. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Gibb, A.A. (2004) `Creative Destruction, New Values, New Ways of Doing Things and New Combinations of Knowledge', paper presented at the Internationalising Entrepreneurship Education and Training Conference (IntEnt), Naples, July.
• Henry, C., Hill, F.M. & Leitch, C.M. (2004) `The Effectiveness of Training for New Business Creation: A Longitudinal Study', International Small Business Journal 22(3): 249—71.[Abstract]
• Henry, C., Hill, F.M. & Leitch, C.M. (2005) `Entrepreneurship Education and Training: Can Entrepreneurship be Taught? Part II', Education and Training 47(3): 158—69.[CrossRef]
• Hills, G.E. (2004) `Entrepreneurship Education: Market Segmentation and Learner Needs', in H. P. Welsch (ed.) Entrepreneurship: The Way Ahead, pp. 287—300. New York: Routledge.
• Hobbs, P. & Boucher, A. (1997) `An Analysis of Teaching Methods, Costs and Student Preferences', Active Learning 7(December): viii—x.
• Huxham, M. (2005) `Learning in Lectures: Do "Interactive Windows" Help?', Active Learning in Higher Education 6(1): 17—31.[Abstract]
• Kirby, D.A. (2004) `Entrepreneurship Education: Can Business Schools Meet the Challenge?', Education and Training 46(8/9): 510—19.[CrossRef]
• Laurillard, D. (1993) Rethinking University Teaching: A Framework for the Effective Use of Educational Technology. London: Routledge.
• Mayer, R.E. (1999) `Designing Instruction for Constructivist Learning ', in C. M. Reigeluth (ed.) Instructional Design Theories and Models, pp. 141—59. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Reigeluth, C. M., ed. (1999) Instructional Design Theories and Models, Vol 2. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Reiser, R.A. & Dempsey, J.V. (2002) Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
• Robinson,H.,Smith,M.,Galpin,F.,Birchall,D.&Turner,I.( 1998)`AsGoodas IT Gets: Have We Reached the Limits of What Technology Can Do For Us?', Active Learning 9(December): 50—3.
• Russell, T.L. (1999) The No Significant Difference Phenomenon. Raleigh: North Carolina State University.
• Sandercock, P. (2004) `Innovations in Entrepreneurship Education: Strategy and Tactics for Joining the Ranks of Innovative Entrepreneurship Programs in Higher Education', in H. P. Welsch (ed.) Entrepreneurship: The Way Ahead, pp. 271—86. New York: Routledge.
• Schank, R.C., Berman, T.R. & Macpherson, K.A. (1999) `Learning by Doing', in C. M. Reigeluth (ed.) Instructional Design Theories and Models, pp. 164—81. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Stoney, S. & Oliver, R. (1997) `Making Interactive Multimedia Appealing to Adult Learners', paper presented at Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, Calgary, July.
• Thompson, J.L. (1999) `The World of the Entrepreneur: A New Perspective', Journal of Workplace Learning 11(6): 209—24.
• Westhead, P. (1999) `Using Graduate Skills in Small and Medium-sized Enterprises', International Small Business Journal 17(3): 95—9.
• Whitelegg, E., Scanlon, E. & Hatzipanagos, S. (1997) `Multimedia Motion: Motivating Learners', ALT-J 5(1): 65—9.
• Whiteley, T. (1995) `Enterprise in Higher Education: An Overview from the Department for Education and Employment', Education and Training 37(9): 4—8.

Active Learning in Higher Education, Vol. 8, No. 3, 201-217 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1469787407081887


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Cooper, B. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?