Active Learning in Higher Education

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zepke, N.
Right arrow Articles by Leach, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Active Learning in Higher Education, Vol. 6, No. 1, 46-59 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1469787405049946
© 2005 SAGE Publications

Integration and adaptation

Approaches to the student retention and achievement puzzle

Nick Zepke

Massey University at Wellington, New Zealand, n.zepke{at}massey.ac.nz

Linda Leach

Massey University at Wellington, New Zealand, L.J.Leach{at}massey.ac.nz

Tertiary institutions are under increasing pressure to improve student outcomes such as retention, persistence and completion. In 2002, the New Zealand Ministry of Education commissioned a team of Massey University researchers to conduct a best evidence synthesis of literature on how institutions might improve student outcomes. Our study found two different discourses on this. One predominates, centring on what institutions do to fit students into their existing cultures. The other is still emerging and challenges the dominant discourse. Rather than requiring students to fit the existing institutional culture, it suggests that cultures be adapted to better fit the needs of increasingly diverse students. This article has four sections. First, a survey of background literature introduces competing theoretical approaches to outcomes research. Second, we explain how the survey was conducted. Third, we summarize the findings of 146 research studies. Finally we raise some challenges for practice based on the emerging discourse.

Key Words: institutional support • retention • student achievement • student outcomes • teaching practices


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Active Learning in Higher EducationHome page
P. Young, M. Glogowska, and L. Lockyer
Conceptions of early leaving: a comparison of the views of teaching staff and students
Active Learning in Higher Education, November 1, 2007; 8(3): 275 - 287.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Active Learning in Higher EducationHome page
M. Glogowska, P. Young, and L. Lockyer
Should I go or should I stay?: A study of factors influencing students' decisions on early leaving
Active Learning in Higher Education, March 1, 2007; 8(1): 63 - 77.
[Abstract] [PDF]